PictureErin Andrews of Fox Sports
Since I extensively follow rankings and polls, I noticed the disparity in the amount of male voters compared to female in the Associated Press Top 25 Poll for college football. Of the 59 voters listed in the AP Poll for college football, only one is a woman, less than two percent of the pool. Approximately 60 voters are selected each year and the 2013 list has yet to be developed. After thorough research, it is clear that the AP needs to make a concerted effort to find more qualified female voters.

Of course, an obvious statistic is that females make up roughly half of the general population. But according to a recent study by UCF, women are also around 10 to 20 percent of the APSE journalism workforce and as listed on Sports Business Daily, nearly 40 percent of NFL fans are female. There is no doubt women are interested in football and working in the media.

Below is an excerpt from a 2012 report published by The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport (TIDES) at the University of Central Florida. It was requested by the Associated Press Sports Editors. Let's just say that the results were not good:  

"For 2012, the grade for racial hiring practices for APSE newspapers and websites remained at a C+, the same grade issued in the 2010 Study. The grade issued for gender hiring practices remained constant as well, recording the third consecutive F for gender hiring practices. The APSE newspapers have received a failing grade for gender since TIDES began issuing grades in the 2008 Report Card. Grades were not issued for the 2006 Report Card. The combined grade for 2012 was a D+." (SportsJournalismInstitute.org)
I emailed over half of last season's voters as well as other sources for information. I asked voters the following question:
"How were you selected to become a voter for the AP Top 25? Are there any requirements to become a voter or anything particular in the selection process that is worth noting?"
I received several responses with some useful insights. And others were not so forthcoming. One voter responded, “Happy to help but you should research how the voters are selected so you don't just get the same response from everyone --- it's easy to find.”

To say that it is easy to find is a joke. The only information publicly listed on any of the AP websites about qualifications or selection process for voters is this: 
"A panel of 60 sports writers and broadcasters from around the country votes on the poll weekly. All of the voters have an extensive background in covering college football." (AP)
Other voters did give some quality input. Some information I already assumed such as that they are typically connected to the AP in some way. While I will commend the AP in laying down guidelines to rule out things like “homerism” in the voting process, conversely they have a vague and broad guideline for the selection process regarding the poll constituents. 

The process bides highly on a hand me down and who do you know type of system. That does not mean the journalists have not extensively covered college football or are not qualified. Here's a more informative response I received by email:
“I was asked last summer by the local AP writer... if I would be a voter after one of the local voters left the beat. I was entering my second year on the beat after serving as our paper's national college football writer for three years -- and an NFL beat writer for the previous 12.

I don't know what the requirements are to be a voter. I think the selector has to believe that the person he selects will be conscientious, but there's no litmus test.”

The writer above is no doubt qualified, but it's how he gets the vote that leads to the trouble of diversity in the poll. This voter and two others responded that they were asked by local AP writers with one of them saying he “inherited” the position from within. 

Are there specific guidelines to the selection process that creates at least a short list of candidates? No, just broad criteria that leads to a buddy system of recruitment. 

I also emailed sources of the PollSpeak.com and the Associated Press. PollSpeak.com emailed back with a link to information on their site.

Here is what they found out about how the AP chooses voters:
"The bureau chief, many in conjunction with the sports writer, select the voter(s) from their state/region. Some rotate the vote every year to give different members a chance, some don't. About half of the writers/broadcasters let the local sports writer or bureau manager know he/she is interested in voting; we also seek out writers/broadcasters. Usually we contact the individual directly."  (Pollspeak.com Ranking The Polls)
The AP ranked third among the three polls analyzed by PollSpeak in choosing the voters and they were also discredited for voter qualifications. This is all that PollSpeak had listed for the AP qualifications:
"They have to be involved in college football coverage locally, regionally or nationally."
I spoke by phone with AP Sports Editor Terry Taylor; she is the first woman sports editor at the Associated Press. Taylor assured me that they seek out knowledgeable and reliable voters. She also said that there's some difficulty finding media members that can coordinate the poll with their travel schedules. Taylor stated she does not know the voters personally. She released the following statement via email:
"We cast a wide net and seek out the best college football reporters in the country." 
A broad guideline can sometimes lead to a more exclusive environment rather than inclusive. The AP Top 25 Poll is different from a workplace environment so they are more free to do as they please. It's not as extreme as the Augusta National Club, but not far off and more should be expected from a media outlet.

The only female listed as a voter on the AP site is Carrie Anderson. The voter list for 2013 will be determined this summer, but there still needs to be six women in the poll for there to be just 10 percent females. Anderson did not return my email and I kept the names of the voters that responded confidential since I did not request an official statement. It is also important to note that racial diversity is somewhat lacking, but not as drastic as the gender disparity. 

There are enough sideline reporters, writers, and other females in media involving college football that there are plenty of choices. If anyone has the power to find an acceptable number of qualified women for the polls, it should be the Associated Press. The AP has around 3,700 employees globally with about two-thirds of them journalists and editors in more than 300 locations worldwide

When a person thinks of a female in the media and college football, the name Erin Andrews of Fox Sports has to pop into their head. There are others as well such as Graham Watson of Yahoo Sports and Jemele Hill of ESPN. Hill confirmed via Twitter that she previously had a vote in both the college basketball and football polls. 

However, there's still a stigma by some that believe women do not belong in sports. Deadspin reported about hate mail that Jemele Hill received including extreme sexism and racism (Let's Play "Count The Slurs In Jemele Hill's Hate Mail"). Graham Watson had an article devoted to bashing her titled Graham Watson- You Suck on the site SpitBloodtcu.com. The article contains vulgar language throughout and the writer even went as far as saying the following about Graham:
"...show everyone what's wrong with her, other than the obvious "she's a woman writing about a man's game" thing (sorry ladies...)."
This report may anger some, but I simply want to bring out the issue in lack of gender diversification regarding the college football AP Top 25 Poll. You would think media that is usually so highly critical of other organizations that lack diversity would make an obligation to not fail on something so outdated as women’s suffrage.

Maybe, the Associated Press should heed the words of one of their own. AP writer Tim Dahlberg wrote this about Augusta National: 
"They do have plenty of things to be proud of over the years. Admitting a few token women isn't one of them." (AP)

Note: Special thanks to the media members that responded, AP Sports Editor Terry Taylor, and PollSpeak.com. 


 
 
ACC
Atlantic
Florida State (10-3) 12.22
NC State (7-5) 9.35
Clemson (4-8) 8.3
Maryland (5-7) 7.616
Boston College (4-8) 7.014
Wake Forest (2-10) -3.97
Coastal
Virginia Tech (13-0) 15.86
North Carolina (11-1)15.63
Miami (8-4) 12.38 *does not include recent suspension of players.
Georgia Tech (8-4) 8.56
Duke (4-8) 5.324
Virginia (1-11) -.917

Virginia Tech is projected to win the ACC by beating Florida State in a close game. North Carolina has a high Momentum score and a projected record of 11-1, but the firing of Butch Davis may have a strong effect which is not calculated in the score.

Big Ten
Legends
Nebraska (9-3) 16.15
Michigan State (9-3) 15.5
Iowa (11-2) 14.33
Northwestern (8-4) 10.647
Michigan (9-3) 3.514
Minnesota (2-10) -.134
Leaders
Ohio State (12-1) 14.975
Wisconsin (10-2) 14.22
Penn State (8-4) 13.125
Illinois (8-4) 8.423
Indiana (3-9) .0095
Purdue (2-10) -1

The Momentum rankings show that Ohio State should still have another good season despite losing head coach Jim Tressel and quarterback Terrelle Pryor, but Iowa is projected to beat them in the Big Ten championship game.

Big East
Pitt (9-3) 13.656
Uconn (9-3) 10.643
West Virginia (11-1) 10.559
Cincinnati (11-1) 10.537
South Florida (6-6) 7.766
Syracuse (3-9) 3.35
Rutgers (3-9) 2.722
Louisville (3-9) .317

The Big East is projected to be a three way tie between Pitt, West Virginia, and Cincinnati. Two of Pitt’s losses are to out of conference teams and they are more likely to finish lower in the BCS standings than West Virginia or Cincinnati since they are projected with more losses.

Pac 12
North
Stanford (11-1) 21.885
Oregon (13-0) 21.093
California (7-5)6.386
Washington (3-9) 4.943
Oregon State (4-8) 4.146
Washington State (1-11) -6.102
South
Utah (12-1) 16.7
USC (9-3) 12.033
Arizona (7-5) 10.091
Arizona State (6-6) 5.712
Colorado (2-11) 1.887
UCLA (3-9) 1.817

Utah’s score may be off since they just switched conferences, but we will see. Either way Utah should have a chance at winning the Pac-12 South. Oregon is scored to win the Pac-12 championship despite Stanford having a higher Momentum score and playing Oregon at home during the season, but Oregon is a good road team and Stanford has not established a strong enough home field advantage over the last five season so the Ducks are very tightly projected to beat the Cardinal.

Other teams
TCU (11-1) 20.933
Boise State (12-0) 19.5
UCF (13-0) 15.04
Temple (13-0) 14.451
Notre Dame (7-5) 11.056
BYU (8-4/7-5) 9.067

Boise State and TCU should dominate the Mountain West. Since the game between the Broncos and Horned Frogs is going to be on the blue turf, Boise State is projected to beat TCU in a tight one.

UCF and Temple are a couple of surprise non-BCS teams. A few of Temple’s wins are very close. Penn State and Maryland are a couple of teams that Temple is scored to beat which may not be too unrealistic since the Owls only lost to the Nittany Lions 22-13 last season and they beat a BCS team in Uconn. The defensive trend of Temple is another factor that helps their Momentum score. UCF is trending in the right direction in terms of wins and points allowed as well as bringing in another good recruiting class. The Knights have a schedule that could lead them to double digit wins again if not the projected 13.

Notre Dame’s score and projected record shows another year of transition for Brian Kelly’s Fighting Irish. Sometimes people criticize the strength of Notre Dame’s schedule, but it is stouter than critics claim. This season they are scheduled to play three Big Ten, three ACC, two Pac-12, two Big East, one MWC, and one independent team with three teams ranked in the top 25.

The Momentum Rankings show that BYU should be either 8-4 or 7-5. Their game against Ole Miss is too close to call. Their first season as an independent should be good, but not great. They still need to gain more momentum to beat their rival Utah in the Holy War.

*Conference Championships are included in projections.
*Games against FCS teams were not projected. However, teams were given a win for FCS games to show a better depiction of the projected season record, but this does not help in accuracy since FCS teams do win some games.
*Bowl games are not projected.